Legal Opinion

EATON v. FIGASKI

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 2021No. 1:16-cv-00279-SPBUnknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAURA J. EATON, ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. 1:16-CV-279 ) ) V. ) ) RICHARD FIGASKI, et al, ) RE: Motion for summary judgment Defendants. ) ECF No. 127 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION U.S. D.J. Susan Paradise Baxter 1. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY . Plaintiff originally brought this action against Millcreek Township, Township Supervisors Richard Figaski and John Groh, Police Chief Michael Tesore, and Police Officer Corporal Robert Bucko.! The legal claims in this action arise out of the filing of four criminal charges against…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API