Legal Opinion

Steiner Corporation v. Johnson & Higgins Of California

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1998No. 96-4044Published

1Opinion of the Court

135 F.3d 684

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2313,

Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23945M, 98 CJ C.A.R. 1231,

98 CJ C.A.R. 425

STEINER CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation,

Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,

and

Carol S. McCormick, Administrator of the Steiner Corporation

Retirement Plan, and Steiner Corporation

Retirement Plan, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants,

v.

JOHNSON & HIGGINS OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation;

Donald F. Reeves and Roy J. Bertoldo,

Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.

No. 96-4044.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 13, 1998.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing March 9, 1998.

Peter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. United States v. MacKSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Lincoln Grain, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API