Legal Opinion

Marshall v. South Pittsburg Lumber & Coal Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

From this award in a Workmen’s Compensation case both parties have appealed in error to this court. The defendant urges that plaintiff was an independent contractor, not an employee. The plaintiff is dissatisfied with the amount of the award.

Defendant is a lumber dealer in South Pittsburg and its establishment is equipped with machinery necessary for cutting up lumber to dimensions desired and dressing the same. Plaintiff is a carpenter by trade living in the same town. He undertakes independent contracts for which he purchases lumber from defendant. While not engaged on outside jobs, he has,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bry-Block Merc. Co. v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Quarry v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Allen v. ChamberlainTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Excel Polymers, LLC v. BroylesTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Irvan v. BoundsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Income Life Ins. Co. v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Byrd v. Pioneer-Jellico Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API