Legal Opinion

Gas Products Co. v. Rankin

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1922No. 5,031Published

1Opinion

Opinion on Motion for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

For the reason that the motion for a rehearing does not present any proposition or question which was not fully considered by the court in rendering its decision, and not anything is thereby presented to change the opinion of any member of this court who participated in the original decision upon the question decided, the motion for rehearing is denied. Mr. Justice Farr takes no part in deciding the petition for rehearing.

The petition for rehearing is presented to the court under such circumstances and conditions as to present clearly to the court, in view of…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Aspden's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Peoples v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. United States v. Knight's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. McCutcheon v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Public Schools v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API