Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Reams v. Riggan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 2012No. COA12-470Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeasley, Judge

I agree with the majority with regard to the issue of custody, but respectfully dissent and would reverse and remand for further findings on the issues of medical insurance and child support.

With regard to the issue of medical insurance, the majority asserts that Defendant does not argue that the trial court erred by failing to make sufficient findings.1 However, a careful review of *88Defendant’s arguments reveals that Defendant indeed argues that the trial court erred by failing to make specific findings of fact with regard to the availability of medical insurance. Defendant’s overall claim is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Buncombe County ex rel. Frady v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API