Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Zefi

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2011No. Docket No. 299034PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange (defendant) appeals by right, challenging the circuit court’s denial of its motion for partial summary disposition on the issue of underinsured-motorist coverage.1 We affirm.

Defendant insures a vehicle owned by Orlander Meadows, Jr., which was involved in an accident while *395plaintiff was a passenger. Plaintiff suffered injuries and sought underinsured-motorist benefits from defendant. The underinsured-motorist provision of the insurance policy included an exception providing: “This coverage does not apply to bodily injury sustained by a person . . . [w]hile…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Woodman v. Kera LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Morinelli v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. General Accident Insurance Company of America v. Louis I. Gonzales, Rosa Janeski, Pauline SetmajerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Peaker Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Western Agricultural Ins. Co. v. Arbab-AzzeinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Estate of Ryan Charles v. Spartan Steel Coating LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API