Legal Opinion
In re Gilchrist
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.
This proceeding under the Public Service Commission Law (hereinafter referred to as the P. S. C. Law), section 19, paragraph 3 (as amd. by Laws of 1921, chap. 134), was begun by an order to show cause issued upon the affidavit of the chairman of the Transit Commission of the State of New York, setting forth that Gerhard M. Dahl, a witness in a pending proceeding before the Commission, had refused, without reasonable or proper cause, to answer legal, pertinent and material questions when summoned to testify before the Commission, although directed to do so. The motion is predicated also upon…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Bronx Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. FullenNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Corporation Counsel v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Carlisle v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- People v. SolomonNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.