In Re Harris
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin
Respondent is a persistent violator of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Since becoming a lawyer, the number and nature of her transgressions have struck at the core values that define a lawyer’s responsibility to clients, the court, and the profession. Basic honesty and a minimal level of competence are indispensable qualifications to practice law in this State. The pattern of respondent’s conduct over a course of years makes clear that she does not possess those essential qualifications. When a lawyer’s derelictions are so many and so grave, our paramount concern must be to protect the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- In Re NigohosianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Matter of RigolosiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- In Re GalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- LoBiondo v. SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Loigman v. TP. COMMITTEE OF MIDDLETOWNSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Buchanan v. LeonardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- In the Matter of Peter J. Cammarano, III, an Attorney at LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.