Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Roche, Inc.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1994No. A-92-1039Published

1DissentHannon, Judge

I must respectfully dissent from significant portions of the majority’s opinion. To the extent that a crime was committed, I readily agree with the majority’s opinion that the corporate defendant can be guilty of the crimes charged and that the evidence convincingly establishes that the defendant corporation practiced deception as that term is used and defined in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-512 (Reissue 1989). However, I cannot agree with the majority’s application of the facts to § 28-512 and to the grading of the offenses under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-518 (Reissue 1989).

“A person commits theft if he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AurgemmaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  2. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Lamoyne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. State v. ForsheeUtah Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API