Dahms v. Osteopathic Hospital of Maine
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] Osteopathic Hospital of Maine appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting the petitions of Russell Dahms for restoration and medical benefits pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act. The hospital contends that the employee’s petitions are time-barred because they were filed later than ten years after the date of the employer’s last payment under the Act. See 39 M.R.S.A. § 95 (Supp.1982), repealed and replaced by P.L.1991, ch. 885, §§ A-7, A-8 (codified at 39-A M.R.S.A. § 306 (2001)). The hearing officer concluded that the employer’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dobson v. Quinn Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Danforth v. L.L. Bean, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Thompson v. Claw Island FoodsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Rutter v. Allstate Automobile InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jandreau v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Robert E. Dupuis v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025