Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Ringstaff

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1925No. 3 Div. 717PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULD1N, J.

“Oral examination in Open Court in Equity Suits. — In all cases in equity the judge before whom the ease is pending may‘at any time before final decree cause any or all of the witnesses to be examined orally before him in open court.” Code 1923, § 6574.

This statute is clear and inclusive. It does not admit of the construction that testimony should be first taken by deposition and witnesses thereafter called before the court only for purposes of fuller examination, nor that oral testimony is limited to any special issue or class of witnesses.

The suggestion that a hearing upon oral…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Achelis v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Pitts v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schowalter v. SchowalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Arrington v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Hanson v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Walls v. WallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. In the Matter of Estate of BumstedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API