Legal Opinion

Marbut v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided September 7, 2001No. 10-01-091-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

VANCE, Justice.

On original submission, we dismissed this case for want of jurisdiction because of our prior holding that State v. Riewe foreclosed the opportunity to amend a notice of appeal. Marbut v. State, 49 S.W.3d 585 (Tex.App.-Waco 2001, no pet. h.) (citing State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408 (Tex.Crim. App.2000); Craddock v. State, 32 S.W.3d 886, 887 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000, no pet.)). 1 However, Marbut’s Petition for Discretionary Review points out reasons why we should hear this appeal.

Marbut was indicted for Theft in an amount of $1,500 or more but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Maxey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  3. Craddock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Luera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  2. Bonnie Sue Marbut v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  3. Luera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  4. Marbut v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  5. Marbut v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API