Morris v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIPS, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error (hereinafter, for convenience, designated the defendant) was indicted and convicted on various counts for the violation of certain provisions of the stat*674ufe Respecting the manufacture and sale of oleomargarine. Act Aug. 2, 1886, c. 840, 24 Stat. 209; volume 2, p. 2228, c. 7b, U. S. Comp. St.’ 1901. Some of the counts on which convictions were had were predicated of the amendment to section 3 of said act. 32 Stat. 194, approved May 9, 1902, c. 784, 32 Stat. 194. The eighth count on which, conviction was had was under section 6 of said chapter 7b.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jelke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Sunderland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Seymour v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Knauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.