Legal Opinion

Pierce Oil Corporation v. Gilmer Oil

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1921No. 1808PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Grayson County ; Silas Hare, Judge. Action by the Gilmer Oil Company against the Pierce Oil Corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

For several months prior to January 5, 1919, the Pierce Oil Corporation had been purchasing all of the oil output of the Gilmer Oil Company from the Heald-ton field in Oklahoma, under a contract dated August 2, 1918, which provided for such purchase and fixed the prices, terms, etc., but which provided that it was terminable by either party on five days’ notice. On January 5,1919, R. L. Steiner, the purchasing agent of the Pierce Oil Corporation, who had authority to make contracts for it, wrote the following letter to the Gilmer Company:

"As the United States Fuel Administration has removed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Watkins v. JunkerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Texas Seed & Floral Co. v. Chicago Set & Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. State v. HoffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vise v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Prescott-Phœnix Oil & Gas Co. v. Gilliland Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Hegar v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. McAulay v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Eugene B. Smith & Co., Inc. v. RussekCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API