Legal Opinion

State v. Hoffman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1918No. 3006PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Duval County. The State sued Hoffman to collect taxes and penalty for non-payment. Plaintiff had judgment only for the taxes, which had been tendered into court, and was denied recovery of the penalty. The judgment being affirmed on appeal by the State, it thereupon obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

This was a proceeding by the State to recover of the defendant, Hoffman, State and county taxes for the year 1913, with penalties and interest and foreclosure of the tax lien upon certain real estate. There was no dispute as to the taxes. Judgment, therefore, was rendered for the State. The real controversy is whether the State was entitled to the penalties, interest and costs, and a foreclosure of the lien, as to which its prayer was denied. The case is here upon a writ of error allowed by the Committee of Courts of Civil Appeals Judges, the judgment of the trial court having been affirmed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brock v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Land and Cattle Co. v. Board, Tax CollectorTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Blanc v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Houston and Houston Independent School District v. Standard-Triumph Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Central Appraisal District of Rockwall County v. LallTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Republic Ins. Co. v. Highland Park Independent School Dist. of Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Young v. FittsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Fort Worth v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API