Legal Opinion
At & T CORP. v. Lanzo Const. Co., Florida
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 14, 1999No. 98-2203-CIVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HIGHSMITH, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Lanzo Construction Co., Florida’s (“Lanzo”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed February 18, 1999. For the following reasons, Lanzo’s Motion is denied.
FACTS
AT & T Corporation (“AT & T”) is a telecommunications company which owns underground fiberoptic cables in Miami, Florida. Lanzo is a construction company that was hired to install underground sewer mains for the City of Miami. While working on the installation of a sewer main, Lanzo struck a 20-inch water main causing a major…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Meakin v. DreierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Hawkins v. Garford Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- A. Mortellaro & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc. v. Mastec, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Sprint Communications Co. v. Western Innovations, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc. v. Glendale Excavation Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- MCI, LLC v. Patriot Engineering & Environmental, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
- Gonzalez v. Barrenechea, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.