Legal Opinion

Howell v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Coos: James W. Hamilton, Judge. Action by William Howell against Alfred Johnson. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

The plaintiff sues for a balance claimed to be due him on the purchase price of certain saw logs sold and delivered by him to the defendant, of the alleged value of $13,832.72, of which amount he has paid $11,883.50. The defendant denies that he received logs of that value, or of any greater value than $11,004.36, including stumpage, or that he paid plaintiff any other or greater sum than $11,093.83, and affirmatively alleges that the logs were purchased by him in pursuance of an express contract in writing, subsequently modified by verbal agreement respecting the manner of ascertaining the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Brown v. KimmelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. Fleischner, Mayer & Co. v. KubliOregon Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goltra v. PenlandOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Crawford v. HutchinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Krebs Hop Co. v. LivesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Carlon v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Colwell v. ColwellOregon Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API