Legal Opinion
Trombetta v. Van Amringe
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
The petitioners are charged with the crime of libel upon a complaint lodged against them in the First District Magistrate’s Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan. They apply to this court for a peremptory order of mandamus directing the magistrate to issue to the complaining witness, one Luigi Antonini, a subpcena duces tecum calling for the production of certain books and records at the hearing. The magistrate has refused to issue the subpoena duces tecum upon the following grounds: First, that the attorneys for the petitioners have declined to specify dates, times and places…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- People Ex Rel. Harris v. Commissioners of the Land OfficeNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Matter of Hirshfield v. CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- American Car & Foundry Co. v. Alexandria Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- American Lithographic Co. v. WerckmeisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. Coleman, New York County Courts1973
- People v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- In re R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1987
- In re the Estate of BlakeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
- Doyle v. Police CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.