Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C.G. Schmidt, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
A person who formally accuses their employer of engaging in legally insidious discrimination is afforded protection by the law in that the employer cannot, because of the complaint, take adverse action against the employee. If the employer does take such action, the employee has a separate legally cognizable claim against his or her employer. However, the viability of such a legal recourse is contingent on the employee’s ability to demonstrate that the employer’s action was actually retaliatory in nature and not taken for an entirely different reason.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Molly Joll v. Valparaiso Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Donley v. Stryker Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Benitez v. American Standard Circuits, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Hayes v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hayes v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.