Legal Opinion

Zelaya v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 15, 1998No. 97-3399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Judge.

Appellant’s community control was revoked, and he appeals, arguing that the violation was not willful or substantial. We agree and reverse.

Appellant was employed by a landscaper and his community control required him to be at home if he was not at work. He was supposed to be home by 6:00 p.m., but his community control officer would give him a half hour travel time.

At approximately 6:30 p.m. appellant’s community control officer saw appellant in a sporting goods store carrying a box of sneakers and walking towards the cashier. According to the officer the appellant approached the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Chamness v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kevin Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Montgomery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Terrill A. Murray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API