Legal Opinion

Parr v. Municipal Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1971No. S.F. 22748PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

On July 31, 1968, the City Council of Carmel-by-the-Sea (Carmel) adopted ordinance 697.02 regulating the use of public property. Section (2)(b) of the ordinance declares: “On any public property it shall be unlawful for any person to: . . . [(2) (b)] Climb any tree; or walk, stand or sit upon monuments, vases, fountains, railings, fences, planted areas, or upon any other property not designed or customarily used for such purposes, or to sit on any sidewalks or steps, or to lie or sit on any lawns.” In addition, the ordinance prohibits disfiguration or removal of public…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Muller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Lombard v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rockwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Frazier v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API