Legal Opinion

In re New York, N. H. & H. R.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 14, 1945No. 16562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

These three banks were collateral note-holders when bankruptcy intervened. As secured creditors their appropriate treatment was originally considered by the Interstate Commerce Commission as an integral part of a plan proposed for the reorganization of the principal debtor. After successive modifications of a plan had come before this court I entered an order (Order No. 734, P. R. 11050), approving the plan contained in the Fifth Supplemental Order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, thus giving effect to the essential rulings as to the rights of these banks…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. In Re New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Scheuer v. Salmon Weed & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Bull v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  5. In Re New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. American General Corp. v. Continental Airlines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
  3. Aubrey Kaufman v. Diversified Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API