Legal Opinion

Swinney v. Burnside & Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of /Scott County. The Hon. Felix I. Batsof, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

IVIr. Chief Justice Efglish

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Burnside & Co, brought an action of debt in the Scott Circuit Court, against Swinney and Tumlinson, on a promissory note. The defendants craved oyer of the note sued on, which was granted, the record states, by filing the original; and they demurred to the declaration : the court overruled the demurrer, and they permitted final judgment to be rendered thereon, and appealed to this court.

One of the causes assigned for the demurrer, is an alleged variance between the note declared on, and that granted on oyer, in this, that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vallett v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Pease v. MorganNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  3. Pullen v. ChaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1842
  4. Alder v. GrinerNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Marx Bros. v. Culpepper & DupontSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  3. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. First National Bank v. HattenbachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Kent v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API