Legal Opinion

LYAK v. CITY OF HACKENSACK

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 15, 2024No. 2:23-cv-13104Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY REUVEN LYAK, Plaintiff. om“ Civ. No. 2:23-cv-13104 (WIM) v. CITY OF HACKENSACK; RAYMOND OPINION GUIDETTTL individually and in his official capacity; BENNY MARINO, individually and in his official capacity; XYZ CORP., INC.; JOHN DOES (1-10); and JANE DOES (1-10), Defendants. WILLIAM J. MARTINI U.S.D.J. Plaintiff Reuven Lyak (“Plaintiff”) sues the City of Hackensack (the “City”), Raymond Guidetti (“Guidetti”), and Benny Marino (“Marino”) (collectively “Defendants”) for deprivation of his constitutional rights to free speech and freedom…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API