Legal Opinion
Mayo Hotel v. Barney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 21, 1937No. 27952PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, X
This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, and but one question is involved, which is, whether the State Industrial Commission had jurisdiction. This qrrestion is dependent upon whether the Workmen’s Compensation Law is applicable to the character of work done by claimant, Barney, at the time he was injured. It is readily apparent that the employer, the Mayo Hotel, is not engaged in a business, that of operating a hotel, which eo nomine, falls into the classification of being hazardous as enumerated by the statute, section 13349, O. S. 1931.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Sunshine Food Stores v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- City of Duncan v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montgomery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- McAlester Corporation v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- McClung v. ColclasureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Mayo Hotel Co. v. BarneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Gates v. WeldonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.