Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Pendergast

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1923No. 15162PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The Appellate Court for the Second District affirmed the judgment recovered by Floyd Johnson, defendant in error, in the circuit court of Winnebago county, against E. E. Pendergast, plaintiff in error, for $4800 for personal injuries resulting from a collision of a motorcycle on which the defendant in error was riding, with the automobile of the plaintiff in error, in the city of Rockford on April 23, 1919, and a writ of certiorari was awarded for a review of the judgment.

The original declaration contained nine counts, and included the E. F. Pendergast Company, a corporation, and Margaret I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Meadowcroft v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Elgin, Aurora & Southern Traction Co. v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Helbig v. Citizens' InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Inhabitants of Cohasset v. MoorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Davis v. Marathon Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Barthel v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. DeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cerny-Pickas & Co. v. C. R. Jahn Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API