Legal Opinion

NEWARK TWENTIETH CENTURY TAXICAB ASS'N. v. Lerner

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 19, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 N.J. Super. 363 (1951)

78 A.2d 315

NEWARK TWENTIETH CENTURY TAXICAB ASSOCIATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

HARRY LERNER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided January 19, 1951.

Mr. Charles Handler, attorney for plaintiff.

Messrs. Crummy & Consodine (Mr. Andrew B. Crummy appearing), attorneys for defendant Harry Lerner.

Messrs. Furst, Furst & Feldman (Mr. George Furst appearing), attorneys for defendant David E. Feldman.

Messrs. Rothbard, Harris & Oxfeld (Mr. Emil Oxfeld appearing), attorneys for defendants David Oxfeld and Herman Feldman.

Messrs.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New Jersey Bankers Ass'n v. Van RiperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  2. Baxter v. BaxterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1887
  3. N.J. Bankers Assn. v. Van RiperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Crescent Pk. Tenants Assoc. v. Realty Eq. Corp. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. NJ Home Builders Ass'n v. Div. on Civil RightsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  4. DeMarco v. EstlowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. In Re Estate of NeuwirthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API