Legal Opinion
Dawson v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2009No. 06-56454PublishedCited by 407 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The opinion filed on February 9, 2009, is amended as follows:
At page 1463 of the slip opinion, line 8, after the sentence concluding “ ‘findings or recommendations to which objection is made,’” insert a footnote 2, reading <We note that review by a district judge of a magistrate judge’s findings or recommendations is not the same thing as review by an appellate judge of a trial judge’s judgment. Magistrate and district judges are both judges at the trial, rather than appellate level, so that a district judge does not hear an “appeal”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Sean HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Roell v. WithrowSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. David SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by407 opinions
- Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Tomas Bartolome v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Perez-Denison v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of NorthwestDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Cotton ex rel. McClure v. City of EurekaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- In re: Richard Jackson and Tamara Anne JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
402 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.