Legal Opinion

Barthel v. Crippen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by Otto F. Barthel against George F. Crippen and Lewis Crippen for the specific performance of a contract. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

At a former hearing the application of defendants for leave to remand the case to permit the taking of further testimony was granted. Barthel v. Crippen, 156 Mich. 20 (120 N. W. 15). The additional testimony has been introduced and the court below, upon a consideration of the whole record, entered a decree which, in effect, grants to complainant the relief given by the decree first entered and prayed for in the bill. Defendants have again appealed. The issues made by the pleadings are briefly hut sufficiently stated in the former opinion of this court. Still more briefly, they may be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barthel v. CrippenMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright v. Houdaille-Hershey Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API