Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lacy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1984No. 1541PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant challenges the constitutionality of the Retail Theft Act and the denial of his motion for mistrial because of alleged prosecutorial misconduct. We find no merit in appellant’s claims and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of sentence.

On August 24, 1981, appellant was arrested as he left a Clover Department store and charged with his third offense of retail theft. A search by a Clover security guard yielded Clover merchandise for which appellant had not paid, in a box in appellant’s possession. Appellant’s motion to suppress was denied. Following a jury trial, appellant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GoosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. CliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. GilmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Karkut v. Target Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. TippensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Walker v. May Department Stores Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API