Legal Opinion

Rich Electronics, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 22, 1988No. 87-801PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

In this appeal we must decide the correct interpretation of the tariff which limits the liability of the phone company for service “irregularities.” The interpretation adopted by the trial court is that liability is limited unless it can be shown that the company was guilty of gross negligence or willful misconduct; the interpretation urged by the appellant is that the limitation of liability gives way upon the considerably lesser showing that the company was negligent in failing “to maintain proper standards of maintenance and operation and to exercise reasonable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Wright & Seaton, Inc. v. PrescottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Behrend v. Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. ELEC. SEC. SYSTEMS v. Southern BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Invenchek, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. KaseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. McKenzie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Rich Electronics, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports2003
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API