Legal Opinion

State v. Quintana

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 12, 2004No. Case No. 20030471-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*169MEMORANDUM DECISION

BENCH, Associate Presiding Judge:

1 Raymond Michael Quintana appeals his convictions for burglary, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-202 (2008), and theft, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-404 (2008).

T2 Quintana first argues that fingerprint evidence is inherently unreliable and thus inadmissible under rule 702 of the Utah Rules of Evidence. We review a trial court's decision to admit expert evidence under an abuse of discretion standard. See State v. Schultz, 2002 UT App 366, ¶ 18, 58 P.3d 879.

T3 Rule 702 provides that "[1lf scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. United States v. Patrick Leroy CrispCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. State v. HullCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  4. State v. CowlishawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  5. State v. QuintanaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API