State v. Quintana
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
*169MEMORANDUM DECISION
BENCH, Associate Presiding Judge:
1 Raymond Michael Quintana appeals his convictions for burglary, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-202 (2008), and theft, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-404 (2008).
T2 Quintana first argues that fingerprint evidence is inherently unreliable and thus inadmissible under rule 702 of the Utah Rules of Evidence. We review a trial court's decision to admit expert evidence under an abuse of discretion standard. See State v. Schultz, 2002 UT App 366, ¶ 18, 58 P.3d 879.
T3 Rule 702 provides that "[1lf scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. Patrick Leroy CrispCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. HullCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. CowlishawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. QuintanaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004