Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blake v. Hansen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1936No. File No. 7834Published

1DissentPolley, P. J.

I am unable to agree with the majority opinion in this case; nor do I think the statement of facts in the opinion sufficient to give a fair view of the issues involved. The acton was 'brought for the purpose of having two warranty deeds executed by defendant Ferdinand Hansen, conveying to the defendant (Mary C. Hansen 160 acres of land in ‘Clay county, canceled and set aside.

■Said defendants were married in 1889, and from that time down to and including the time of the trial of this action lived together as husband and wife. During the month of June, 1930, defendant Ferdinand Hansen, together…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  2. Warner v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Anderson v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Chaney v. Gauld Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Zimmer v. DansbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API