Legal Opinion

Hoaglin v. . Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 13, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These two actions were brought to recover damages for negligently failing to transmit and deliver a telegraphic message sent by the plaintiff, S.D. Hoaglin, from Pineville, N.C. to his brother, the other plaintiff, who was at Granite Quarry, N.C. The two cases were consolidated by consent of the parties, and tried together, as they involved substantially the same questions of fact and law. The jury returned the following verdict:

1. Was the defendant guilty of negligent delay in the transmission and delivery of the message sued on, as alleged in the complaint? (392) Answer: Yes.

2. If the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. Barrett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Hendricks v. W. U. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Brewster v. Elizabeth City.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Tillett v. Lynchburg & Durham RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Russ v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Templeton v. . KelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Russ v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Medlin v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Estate of Savino v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API