Legal Opinion

Russ v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The first question for decision is whether the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence or motion for judgment of nonsuit should *506have been sustained. Tbe trial court answered in tbe negative, and we cannot say there was error in tbe ruling.

I. Mental ANGUISH as Easis of Recovery.

Tbe law is well settled in tbis jurisdiction that, in certain cases, substantial damages may be recovered for mental anguish proximately resulting from tbe wrongful or negligent failure of a telegraph company to transmit correctly and deliver promptly a telegraphic message, independently of any bodily or pecuniary injury.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Young v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Hendricks v. W. U. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BroescheTexas Supreme Court · 1889

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Trammell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Larsen v. Banner Health SystemWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Vendola v. Southern Bell Tel. and Tel. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Neece v. Richmond Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API