Legal Opinion

Lipofsky v. Steingut

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 4, 1996No. 1747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

86 F.3d 15

Eugene LIPOFSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Robert STEINGUT, Martin Mankowitz, Carl Sachs, John Fedor,

Carl Sendar, A. Franklin Mahoney, New York State

Workers' Compensation Board, Defendants,

The State Insurance Fund, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 1747, Docket 95-9303.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued May 22, 1996.

Decided June 4, 1996.

Eugene Lipofsky, North Miami, Florida, Plaintiff-Appellant pro se.

Julie S. Mereson, Assistant Attorney General, Albany, New York (Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General of the State of New York, Peter H. Schiff, Deputy Solicitor General, Albany, New…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Cardinal v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Methodist Hospital v. State Insurance FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. LowNew York Court of Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dollinger v. State Insurance FundDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
  2. Palma v. Workers Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Perry v. State Insurance FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Greenwood v. State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. Strunk v. New York State Insurance FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API