Legal Opinion

Byrum v. Bear Investment Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1991No. 89-1546PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

This case raises questions about when enforceable settlement agreements have been formed. The district court concluded that Barney and Elizabeth Byrum had tendered a valid acceptance to Bear Investment Company’s offer to settle their dispute over a parcel of land when the By-rums sent the company a check for the amount specified in the offer and a general release. Although the check sent by the Byrums contained the words “under protest” and the general release stated that the Byrums were “under extreme pressure” to settle in order to save their land, the district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Montagna v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Wells v. WestonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, and Tenneco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  4. Chittum v. PotterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  5. Bangor-Punta Operations, Inc. v. Atlantic Leasing, Ltd.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Byrum v. Bear Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Sui Ping Cheung Ching Chan CheungCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API