Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Gate City National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 21, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action on bank cheek. Before Judge Berry. City court ■of Atlanta. March term, 1896.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Chief Justice.

1. This was. an action in the- city court of Atlanta, filed'. June, 12, 1894, and made returnable to- -the July term, 1894, which began on Monday, July 2. The act of November 30, 1892, establishing new terms for that court, provides that, “all cases brought in said 'court shall be re- • tamable to. and triable at the term next ensuing after twenty days have elapsed from the filing, . . . the - purpose of this act being to- require a case to be filed ■twenty days before the term to’ which it is returnable.” (Acts 1892, p. 220.) A plea to the jurisdiction, on the-ground…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Comer v. DufourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Daniels v. Kyle & BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  3. Daniels v. Kyle & BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  4. Patten v. NewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  5. Van Pelt v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heard v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Johnston v. New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Stein Steel & Supply Company v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Stapleton v. DismukesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. MacAfferr v. Boston & Maine RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API