Legal Opinion

Milton-Freewater & Hudson Bay Irrigation Co. v. Skeen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason alleged in defendant’s plea in abate ment, and also, for the reason that in the final decree in the former companion snit all rights and claims of the Walla Walla Irrigation Company in and to the system of lateral ditches involved in this suit have been adjudged by the Circuit Court to be forever barred and held for naught, and as a result of said final decree there is only a moot and academic question presented by this appeal.

The Washington corporation had filed its statement and made reports in compliance with the statute. The only…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hirschfeld v. McCullaghOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dodge v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. Shipman v. Portland Const. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Klamath Lumber Co. v. BamberOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Major Creek Lum. Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lloyd-Garretson Co. v. Marvin & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API