Legal Opinion

Associated Reforestation Contractors, Inc. v. State Workers' Compensation Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1982No. 104293, CA A20491PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Plaintiff, a trade association representing the interests of reforestation companies, brought this action for a declaratory judgment that defendant Hoedáds,1 a cooperative engaged in the tree-planting business, is subject to the workers’ compensation law, ORS ch 656.

The parties entered into a lengthy stipulation that described the structure and operation of Hoedads. The trial court entered a declaratory judgment. Hoedads appeal, claiming that: (1) its purchase of workers’ compensation insurance on the eve of trial made the controversy moot; (2) plaintiff lacks standing to bring the action;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Budget Rent-A-Car of Washington-Oregon, Inc. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kuhns v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Gates v. McClureOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MT & M Gaming, Inc. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Fenimore v. Blachly-Lane Cnty. C.E.A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Safeway, Inc. v. Oregon Public Employees UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Employment Division v. Surata Soy Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Mt & M Gaming, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API