Legal Opinion

Ratcliff v. Estelle

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1979No. 78-1870PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

If a state court finds that a procedural default forecloses a convicted defendant’s right to challenge collaterally the composition of the grand jury which indicted him, but then proceeds to consider and deny the challenge on the merits, must a federal court deny habeas corpus relief under the contemporaneous objection rule, without *476reaching the merits of the constitutional attack? We agree with the district court that it must.

On appeal from a dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus relief, petitioner Ratcliff contends that blacks were systematically excluded from the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Francis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. PrecioseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. James Harmon, Iii, 080164 v. Tom L. Barton, Robert ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Hall v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. David Huffman v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, the Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Etal.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Ernest John Dobbert v. Charles G. Strickland, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API