Legal Opinion

Hobdy v. Siddens

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 9, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Saimpson—

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit commenced in the Allen circuit court for the purpose of recovering damages for breach of warranty as to kind and quality of millet seed. Appellee Siddens, a farmer owning a rich river bottom farm in Allen county, purchased of appellants, Hobdy and Read, retail seed merchants, at Scottsville, forty bushels of German millet seed at the price of $3.75 per bushel, to be delivered April 1, 1920. As the merchants did not have the seed on hand at the time they agreed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Passinger v. . ThorburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Godshaw v. J. N. Struck & Bro.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  4. Grafton-Stamps Drug Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Gardner v. J. T. Winter & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Craig v. O'RearCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Graham v. John R. Watts & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. The Belt Seed Co. v. Mitchelhill Seed Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API