Legal Opinion
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Panama Canal Co.
District Court, Canal Zone
Decided April 24, 1970No. Civ. No. 6135PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CROWE, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At all times material to this action, the plaintiff, Gulf Oil Corporation, was and still is a corporation organized and existing under and by the virtue of the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and was at all times alleged in the complaint the owner, pro hac vice, of the Steamship GULFSPRAY, a vessel of the United States of America registry, of 18,776 gross tons, 12,215 net tons, 644 feet overall length, beam 84 feet, built by Bethlehem Steel Company and delivered to her owner in 1960. At the time she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Spotton v. DyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- General Petroleum Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Geo. W. Rogers Const. Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Panama Canal Company v. Sociedad De Transportes Maritimos, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corporation, as Owner Pro Hac Vice, of the Steamship Gulfspray, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Panama Canal Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Panama Canal Co.District Court, Canal Zone · 1971
- Natalie Tankships Corp. v. Panama Canal CommissionDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1980
- Gulf Oil Corporation, as Owner, Pro Hac Vice, of the Steamship Gulfspray v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971