Legal Opinion
Natalie Tankships Corp. v. Panama Canal Commission
District Court, Canal Zone
Decided December 18, 1980No. Civ. 79-0354-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. *
The present cause of action under 2 C.Z.C. § 291 1 arose out of damages sustained as a result of the S/T OVERSEAS NATALIE striking the side wall of Miraflores Locks on April 9, 1979. Eliminating those damages as a result of the vessel’s detention by the Board of Local Inspector’s (B.L.I.), the parties have previously stipulated to the liability and quantum of damages levied against the Panama Canal Commission (P.C.C.). The sole issue presented to this Court on a stipulated record is whether Natalie Tankships Corporation (Owner) has a right to be reimbursed for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985