Legal Opinion
United States v. Claude Roger Dumas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 31, 1982No. 81-1387PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Claude Roger Dumas appeals his conviction for conspiring to obtain possession of Dilaudid, a Schedule II controlled substance, by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception, or subterfuge, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. 1 On appeal, among other contentions, Dumas argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We agree and, therefore, discuss only that issue.
In reviewing the conviction we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government to determine whether it was sufficient for any rational trier of fact to find Dumas guilty beyond…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Graham Lee KendallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Anthony Esparsen, United States of America v. Kelly Esparsen, United States of America v. Robert McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. John Wesley Morehead, Sr., John Wesley Morehead, Jr., and Jackie Ray HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alfonso Velasquez, Ramon Dominguez, Esmerido Galvan Olamendi, Ramon Gomez, and Armando GomezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. PevetoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.