Legal Opinion

Medivas, LLC v. Marubeni Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2014No. 12-55375PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

We address whether an order compelling arbitration is appealable when the district court neither explicitly dismisses nor explicitly stays the action. We hold that such an order implicitly stays the action and thus is not “a final decision with respect to an arbitration” under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(3). We also adopt a rebuttable presumption that an order compelling arbitration but not explicitly dismissing the underlying claims stays the action as to those claims pending the completion of the arbitration. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Damian Langere v. Verizon Wireless ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Johnson v. Consumerinfo.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Gabriel v. Island Pacific Academy, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Farrow v. Fujitsu America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Tedesco v. Home Savings Bancorp, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API