Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Village of Skokie

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1998No. 82893Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

Docket No. 82893–Agenda 13–November 1997.

IRVING R. ZIMMERMAN, as Guardian for Scott E. Zimmerman, a Disabled Person, Appellee, v. THE VILLAGE OF SKOKIE et al. , Appellants.

Opinion filed June 18, 1998.

2Opinion of the Court · McMORROWJustice McMORROW

The “special duty” doctrine was first recognized by this court in Huey v. Town of Cicero , 41 Ill. 2d 361 (1968), as an exception to the common law “public duty” rule. The public duty rule is a long-standing precept which establishes that a governmental entity and its employees owe no duty of care to individual members of the general public to provide governmental services, such as police and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API