Legal Opinion

Wheatfall v. Director

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 19, 1964No. [App. No. 40, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

236 Md. 623 (1964)

203 A.2d 894

WHEATFALL

v.

DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION

[App. No. 40, September Term, 1964.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 19, 1964.

Before HENDERSON, C.J., and PRESCOTT, MARBURY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.

2Per curiam

This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency raises questions as to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. The testimony of Dr. Boslow was alone sufficient to support the jury's finding. Cf. Silvestri v. Director, 234 Md. 641 (1964). That case, and the cases therein cited, make it clear that Dr. Boslow's conclusions…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silvestri v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Clark v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Wheatfall v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johns v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Rice v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Cantwell v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Hirons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API