Legal Opinion

King v. . Lewis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

Tbe defendants insist tbat at tbe time tbe plaintiff and bis wife, Hettie Mae King, acquired tbe title to tbe property under consideration, tbe relationship of mortgagor and mortgagee existed between tbe plaintiff and the defendants; consequently, tbe plaintiff, A. S. King, is a trustee for bimself as mortgagee and tbe defendants as mortgagors. This position cannot be sustained. We are not inadvertent to tbe opinions of this Court, which hold tbat a mortgagor cannot buy a superior title or lien to tbat held by him; and bold it for bis own benefit, but tbe act inures to tbe benefit of him for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Capehart v. . DettrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. McLeod v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Den Ex Dem. Ferebee v. ProcterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
  5. Taylor v. . HeggieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Speed v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Stell v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Allied Mortgage & Development Co. v. PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. City of Charlotte v. Little-McMahan Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API