Nupnau v. Hink
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE ENGLISH
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Superior Court dismissing for lack of jurisdiction their complaint to contest the will of Minna Rathje, deceased.
Plaintiffs, who are beneficiaries under a prior will, filed their original and amended complaints within the statutory nine-month period following the date of admission of the will to probate. Named as defendants were the executor under the probated will and the three beneficiaries thereunder, one of whom (the executor) happens also to be an heir of the decedent. As shown by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wilson v. TromlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Stephens v. CollisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Fitzpatrick v. PitcairnIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Metropolitan Trust Co. v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scott v. Bank One Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Nupnau v. HinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Anderson v. GoussetAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Muehlfelt v. VlcekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- Malkov Lumber Co. v. Serafine Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.